THE NON-PARAMETRIC DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS METHOD FOR PORTFOLIO DESIGN IN THE RUSSIAN BOND MARKET
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
THE NON-PARAMETRIC DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS METHOD FOR PORTFOLIO DESIGN IN THE RUSSIAN BOND MARKET
Annotation
PII
S042473880000540-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
110-128
Abstract

In this paper for the first time on the base of the non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method the authors build and test portfolios in the Russian bond market. Using DEA we perform integral evaluation and rank by optimality (efficiency) outstanding ruble corporate bonds from the perspective of a private investor. Our original algorithm for building an optimal bond portfolio includes two analytical procedures: firstly, we identify the determinants of the yield to maturity of ruble corporate bonds for a diversified sample of real sector companies from 2008 to 2015, and then we apply the DEA method for this sample in order to find the optimal set of bonds for the portfolio. At the final stage we test (for 2014–2015) an investment strategy based on picking for the portfolio the ruble corporate bonds that reached the efficiency frontier. In order to identify the determinants of ruble corporate bond yields we analyze a set of macroeconomic and firm-level (financial and nonfundamental) factors, characteristics of bond issues using econometric methods. For the first time in the Russian bond market, we consider not only current but also expected inflation and GDP growth, risk indicators (the volatility index RTS VIX as a proxy). We identify the optimal bond issues (the bond issues that reached the efficiency frontier) taking into account a set of different factors: yield to maturity, duration and liquidity of bond issues, credit risk indicators of bond issuers. The results of a regression analysis confirm our hypothesis that yield to maturity is significantly influenced by revenue of a bond issuer, the repo eligible factor (inclusion of a bond issue in the Lombard list of the Bank of Russia), the government’s share in the equity, the bond issuer’s debt burden indicators, the level of current and expected inflation. The efficiency (optimality) frontier mainly consists of bond issues of large companies with the government’s participation in the equity. Our hypothesis that investing in the bond issues on the efficiency frontier can beat the bond benchmarks’ returns and “return / volatility” ratios are partly confirmed, for the period of 2014 characterized by a decrease in prices of ruble bonds.

Keywords
ruble corporate bonds, active investment strategies, Data Envelopment Analysis
Date of publication
01.07.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
869
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Aleskerov F.T., Belousova V. Yu., Petrushchenko V.V. (2015). Measuring Higher Education Institutions’ Efficiency: Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Approach. Problemy Upravleniya, 5, 2–19 (in Russian).

Anderson R., Mansi S., Reeb D. (2003). Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 263–285.

Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

Bao J., Pan J., Wang J. (2011). The Illiquidity of Corporate Bonds. The Journal of Finance, LXVI(3), 911–946.

Boubakri N., Ghouma H. (2010). Managerial Opportunism, Cost of Debt Financing and Regulation Changes: Evidence from the Sarbanes–Oxley Act Adoption. Working Paper. HEC Montreal.

Bruslerie H. (2004). Active Bond Strategies: What Link between Forecasting Ability, Excess Return and Performance? Journal of Asset Management, 5(2), 105–119.

Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operation Research, 2(6), 429–444.

Cici G., Gibson S. (2012). The Performance of Corporate Bond Mutual Funds: Evidence Based on Security-Level Holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47, 159–178.

Cooper W., Seiford L., Tone K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. N.Y.: Springer.

Ferson W., Henry T.R., Kisgen D.J. (2006). Evaluating Government Bond Funds Using Stochastic Discount Factors. Review of Financial Studies, 19, 423–455.

Fethi M.D., Pasiouras F. (2010). Assessing Bank Efficiency and Performance with Operational Research and Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(2), 189–198.

Gutierrez R., Maxwell W., Xu D. (2008). Persistent Performance in Corporate Bond Mutual Funds. Working Paper. Eugene: University of Oregon.

Huij J., Derwall J. (2008). Hot Hands’ in Bond Funds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 559–572.

Malhotra R., Malhotra D.K., Russel P.S. (2010). Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Rate Bonds. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 16(1), 58–76.

Mansi S., Maxwell W., Miller D. (2011). Analyst Forecast Characteristics and the Cost of Debt. Review of Accounting Studies, 16, 116–142.

Robbins M.D., Simonsen W. (2002). Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Evaluate the Performance of Municipal Bond Issuers. State & Local Government Review, 34 (1), 20–28.

Silva F., Cortez M.C., Armada M.R. (2003). Conditioning Information and European Bond Fund Performance. European Financial Management, 9 (2), 201–230.

Teplova T.V., Sokolova T.V. (2011). Modeling the Cost of Corporate Debt in the Russian Market. Corporate Finance Management, 5, 198–220 (in Russian).

Wald J.K., Long M.S. (2007). The Effects of State Laws on Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 297–319.

Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. (2008). A Survey of Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189 (1), 1–18.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate