- PII
- S042473880004045-8-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S042473880004045-8
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 55 / Issue 1
- Pages
- 101-115
- Abstract
The article offers methodological approaches to the study of features and differences in the population's assessments of living conditions in the regions of Russia. An attempt is made to build aggregated indices that characterize the economic growth potential, the aggregate opinion and estimates of the population of regions, the social concern of citizens and the level of public security. For this purpose, we use data from special sociological surveys and official statistics on 47 subjects of the Russian Federation. Aggregated indices are calculated using the principal component method. Statistical relationships between the constructed indices are investigated, a regression model is constructed that characterizes the dependence of the population's satisfaction on living conditions from the level of economic potential, concern and trust to law enforcement agencies. A comparative analysis of the possibilities of economic growth of regions, levels of satisfaction and concern of the population is carried out. The dynamics of economic potential growth in the regions of the Russian Federation is also analyzed, taking into account the possibility of forecasting and application in social management.
- Keywords
- regions of Russia, sociological research, quality of life, social concern, economic potential, regional security, main components method, regression analysis, conditional forecast.
- Date of publication
- 21.03.2019
- Number of purchasers
- 98
- Views
- 2240
References
- 1. Aivasyan S. (2012). Analysis of the Quality and Lifestyle of the Population. Econometric Approach. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
- 2. Aivasyan S., Afanasiev M., Kudrov A. (2016). Clustering Method of Regions of the Rus-sian Federation Taking into Account the Sectoral Structure of GRP. Applied Econometrics, 1, 2627 (in Russian).
- 3. Balatsky E. (2005). Factors of Life Satisfaction: Measurement and Evaluation. Monitoring of Public Opinion, 4, (76), 4448 (in Russian).
- 4. Davydov A. (1995). Index of social disadvantage. Sociological research, 10, 118128 (in Russian).
- 5. Desai M. (2002). Marxs Revenge: The Resurgence of Capitalism and the Death of Statist Socialism. London: Verso.
- 6. Dzolo D. (2010). Democracy and Complexity: A Realistic Approach. Moscow: NRU HSE (in Russian).
- 7. Gavrilets Y., Klimenko K., Kudrov A. (2016). Statistical analysis of the social tension factors in Russia. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 1, 90111 (in Russian).
- 8. Gavrilets Y., Nikitin S., Chernenkov M. (2018). Populations Assessment of the Life Quality and Social Stability in the Regions of Russia. Moscow: Applied Mathematics Institute (in Russian).
- 9. Hagerty M.R., Cummins R.A., Ferriss A.L., Land K., Michalos A.C., Peterson M. et al. (2001). Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy. Davis: Graduate School of Management University of California.
- 10. Ivanova E. (2017). Rating of Russian Regions by Level of the Life Quality. Available at: http://basetop.ru/reyting-regionov-rossii-po-urovnyu-kachestvu-zhizni-2017/ (accessed: June 2018, in Russian).
- 11. Liga M. (2006). Life Quality as a Basis of Social Security. Moscow: Gardariki (in Rus-sian).
- 12. Luhmann N. (2007). Social Systems. Saint Petersburg: Nauka (in Russian).
- 13. Maslow A. (1999). Motivation and Personality. Saint Petersburg: Evrazija (in Russian).
- 14. Measuring Human Development Index: The Old, the New and the Elegant. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai October 2013. Available at: http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2013-020.pdf (accessed: June 2018).
- 15. Osipov G. (2002). Sociology and Social Myth Creation. Moscow: NormaInfra-M (in Russian).
- 16. Rimashevskaya M., Bochkareva V., Volkova G., Korchagina L. (2012). Regional Fea-tures of the Level and Quality of Life. Moscow: ISEPI RAN, M-Studio (in Russian).
- 17. Sen A. (2010). The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
- 18. Volkova M. (2010). Comparison of Objectivist and Subjectivist Approaches to Measuring Synthetic Latent Categories of the Life Quality: Results of Empirical Analysis of Russian Data. . Applied Econometrics, 3, 6290 (in Russian).
- 19. Zaslavskaya T. (2004). Modern Russian Society. Social Mechanism of Transformation. Moscow: Delo (in Russian).
