ECOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY AT THE MACRO LEVEL: RESOURCE FLOWS, A MODEL OF INTER-BRANCH BALANCE AND WATER EXPORT IN THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ECOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY AT THE MACRO LEVEL: RESOURCE FLOWS, A MODEL OF INTER-BRANCH BALANCE AND WATER EXPORT IN THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY
Annotation
PII
S042473880000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Edition
Pages
39-48
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of indirect material flows (used natural resources are included in in put–output tables). The model permits to study at the macrolevel ecological, economic and social aspects of the influence on the national economy as a whole. An “ecological” rucksack of Russian export is estimated (water is an example).
Keywords
-
Date of publication
01.10.2008
Number of purchasers
2
Views
744
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Bobylev S.N., Khodzhaev A.Sh. (2004): Ehkonomika prirodopol'zovaniya. M.: INFRA!M.
Bobylev S.N., Makeenko P.A. (2001): Indikatory ustojchivogo razvitiya Rossii (ehkologo!ehkonomicheskie aspekty). M.: TsPRP.
Vajtszekker Eh., Lovins Eh., Lovins L. (2000): FAKTOR ChETYRE. Zatrat – polovina, otdacha – dvojnaya. Novyj doklad Rimskomu klubu. M.: Academia.
Galin V.V. (2006): Zapretnaya politehkonomiya!1. Revolyutsiya po!russki. M.: Algoritm.
Danilov-Danil'yan V.I. (2003): Ustojchivoe razvitie (teoretiko!metodicheskij analiz) // Ehkonomika i mat. metody. T. 39. № 2.
Danilov-Danil'yan V.I. (2005): Defitsit presnoj vody i mirovoj rynok // Vodnye resursy. № 5.
Danilov-Danil'yan V.I. (2007): Voda – strategicheskij faktor razvitiya ehkonomiki Rossii // Vestnik RAN. T. 77. № 2.
Devyatkin V.V., Dyukin V.A. (1999): Cbornik udel'nykh pokazatelej obrazovaniya otkhodov proizvodstva i potrebleniya. M.: Nauchno!issledovatel'skij tsentr po problemam upravleniya resursosberezheniem i otkhodami pri Ministerstve ehkonomiki RF i Gosudarstvennom komitete RF po okhrane okruzhayuschej sredy.
Kudryavtseva O.V. (2007): Vozmozhnosti primeneniya mezhotraslevogo balansa pri izuchenii vozdejstviya ehkonomiki na okruzhayuschuyu sredu: ehkologicheskij uscherb ot vybrosov. V sb. “Est' li u Rossii nesyr'evoe buduschee?” Tezisy vystuplenij VI Mezhdunarodnoj Kondrat'evskoj konferentsii. M.: Mezhdunarodnyj fond N.D. Kondrat'eva.
Kudryavtseva O.V. (2007): Prinyatie ehkonomicheskikh upravlencheskikh reshenij s uchetom ehkologicheskikh posledstvij: primenenie mezhotraslevogo balansa pri izuchenii obrazovaniya otkhodov. V kn.: “Ehkonomicheskaya ehffektivnost' razvitiya Rossii”. M.: Ehkonomicheskij fakul'tet MGU, TEIS.
Kudryavtseva O.V. (2007): Primenenie mezhotraslevogo balansa pri opredelenii ehkologicheskogo uscherba // Ispol'zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov v Rossii. № 5 (95).
Kudryavtseva O.V. (2007): Uchet potokov prirodnykh resursov i mezhotraslevoj balans kak sredstva osuschestvleniya resursosberezheniya i analiza ehkologicheskoj ehffektivnosti meropriyatij. M.: TEIS.
Lyapina A.A. (2002): Prirodnyj faktor v natsional'nom dostoyanii strany. M.: MIREhA. Zakon “Ob okhrane okruzhayuschej sredy” № 7!FZ ot 10 yanvarya 2002 goda.
Sergienko O., Ron Kh. (2004): Osnovy teorii ehkoehffektivnosti. SPb.: SPbGUNiPT.
Sistema tablits (2005): Sistema tablits “Zatraty–vypusk” Rossii za 2002 god. Statisticheskij sbornik. Http://www.gks.ru.
Khachaturov T.S. (1985): Ehkonomiya material'nykh resursov – vazhnyj rezerv rosta proizvodstva. V sb.: “Material'nye resursy: ratsional'noe ispol'zovanie i ehkonomiya”. M.: Ehkonomika.
Sharov S.Yu. (2005): Uchet ehkologicheskogo faktora v ramkakh sistemy makroehkonomicheskoj informatsii (na primere vodnykh resursov). Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata ehkonomicheskikh nauk, na pravakh rukopisi. M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova.
European Commission (2003): European Commission. Towards a Thematic Strategy for the Sustainable Use of Natural Resourses, COM (2003) 572 final. Brussels: DG Environment.
Carnoules declaration. Factor 10 Club (1995): Carnoules declaration. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, Energy. Wuppertal.
Hinterberger F., Giljum S., Hammer M. (2003): Material Flow Accounting and Analysis (MFA). A Valuable Tool for Analyses of Society!Nature Interrelationships. Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics. International Society for Ecological Economics. Http://www.ecoeco.org/pdf/material.pdf.
Leontief W. (1970): Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input!Output Approach // Rev. of Econ. Statistics. Vol. 52.
OECD (2004): Recommendation on Material Flows and Resource Productivity. Adopted by the OECD Council on 21 April 2004. Paris: OECD.
Proops J.L. (1998): Energy Intensities, Input!output Analysis and Economic Development. In: Ciaschini M. “Input-output analysis of current developments”. L.: Chapman and Hall.
Sánchez C.J., Bielsa J., Arrojo P. (1998): Water Quality as a Limiting Factor: Concepts and Applications to the Midebro Valley. Zaragoza: University of Zaragoza.
Schmidt-Bleek F. (1994): Wie viel Umwelt bracht der Mensch? MIPS!das Mass fuer oekologisches Wirtschaften. Birkhauser, Berlin, Basel: Birkhauser.
Spandenberg J. (2001): The Environmental Kuznetz Curve: A Methodological Artifact? // Population and environment. Vol. 22. № 6.
Steurer A. (1992): Stoffstrombilanz Österreich. Schriftenreihe Soziale Ökologie // Social Ecologies. Vol. 26.
Velázquez A.E. (2006): An Input!output Model of Water Consumption: Analysing Intersectoral Water Relationships in Andalusia // Ecological Economics. Vol. 56.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate