Abstract
The development of market disequilibrium analysis is traced in the works of Marshall, Hicks, PA-tinkin, Klauer, and others. The contradictions encountered by non-equilibrium analysis are considered, and ways to overcome them are suggested. It is concluded that non-equilibrium analysis does not contradict neoclassical microeconomic theory and does not require its qualitative revision. At the same time, the apparatus of microeconomic analysis should be consistently modified in relation to the problems that the theory of macroeconomics solves. To construct the theory of General disequilibrium, it is necessary to explicitly introduce the absolute price level, the income effect, and the distribution effect into the Keynesian functions of aggregate supply and demand prices.
Comments
No posts found