Везде
A COMPUTER MODEL OF IDEOLOGICAL CONFRONTING BETWEEN TWO POLITICAL FORCES IN THE SOCIETY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
A COMPUTER MODEL OF IDEOLOGICAL CONFRONTING BETWEEN TWO POLITICAL FORCES IN THE SOCIETY
Annotation
PII
S042473880000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yuriy Gavrilets 
ORCID: 0000-0002-5903-8674
Edition
Volume 50 Issue 3
Pages
73-85
Abstract

The paper provides an arbitrary dynamics model of social groups’ political positions. These changes occur as a result of the contacts between groups under the information infl uence of the external environment. Computer calculations on the model allows to specify the role of different parameters when forecasting.

Keywords
social groups, socio-psychological attitude, imitative behavior, social interaction, Markov chains
Date of publication
01.07.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
880
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Gavrilets Yu.N. (1974). Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoe planirovanie. Sistemy i modeli. M.: Ehkonomika.


Gavrilets Yu.N., Ofman Yu.P. (2012). Komp'yuternoe modelirovanie formirovaniya sotsial'no-ehticheskoj struktury. V sb.: “Matematicheskoe i komp'yuternoe modelirovanie sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskikh protsessov”. Vyp. 5. M.: TsEhMI RAN.


Gubanov D.A., Novikov D.A., Chkhartishvili A.G. (2010). Sotsial'nye seti: modeli informatsionnogo vliyaniya, upravleniya i protivoborstva. M.: Fizmatlit.


Makarov V.L. (2013). Sotsial'noe modelirovanie nabiraet oboroty // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. T. 49. № 4.


Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R. (2013). Primenenie superkomp'yuternykh tekhnologij v obschestvennykh naukakh // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. T. 49. № 4.


Rashevskij N. (1966). Dve modeli: podrazhatel'noe povedenie i raspredelenie statusa. V sb.: “Matematicheskie metody sovremennoj burzhuaznoj sotsiologii”. M.: Mir.


Semenchin E.A., Babchenko O.V. (2006). Primenenie tsepej Markova dlya prognozirovaniya migratsionnykh protsessov // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. № 2.


Staroverov O.V. (1997). Azy matematicheskoj demografii. M.: Nauka.


Baldassarri D., Bearman P.S. (2007). Dynamics of Political Polarization // American Sociological Review. Vol. 72 (5). R. 784–811.


Cioffi -Revilla C. (2002). Invariance and Universality in Social Agent-Based Simulations // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 99. R. 7314–7316.


Cioffi -Revilla C. (2005). A Canonical Theory of Origins and Development of Social Complexity // Journal of Mathematical Sociology. Vol. 29. R. 133–153.


Cioffi-Revilla C. (2010). A Methodology for Complex Social Simulations // Journal of Artifi cial Societies and Social Simulation. Vol. 13 (1).


Davern M. (1997). Social Networks and Economic Sociology: A Proposed Research Agenda for a More Complete Social Science // American Journal of Economics & Sociology. Vol. 56. Issue 3. P. 287–302.


Gavrilets Ser., Anderson D.G., Turchin P. (2010). Cycling in the Complexity of Early Societies // Cliodynamics. Vol. 1 (1).


Helbing D. (1994). Mathematical Model for The Behavior of individuals in a Social Field // Journal Mathematical Sociology. Vol. 19 (3). P. 189–219.


Moody J., Douglas R.W. (2003). Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups // American Sociological Review. Vol. 68(1).


Opp K.-D. (2011). Modeling Micro-Macro Relationships: Problems and Solutions // Journal of Mathematical Sociology. Vol. 35.


Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.


Weidlich W. (2002). Sociodynamics. London, Taylor & Francis.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate