Везде
MODELING THE PROBLEM SITUATIONS USING THE ANALYTICAL NETWORK HIERARCHY PROCESS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MODELING THE PROBLEM SITUATIONS USING THE ANALYTICAL NETWORK HIERARCHY PROCESS
Annotation
PII
S042473880000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Tatyana Kravchenko 
Edition
Volume 48 Issue 4
Pages
99-112
Abstract

Modeling the decision-making problem situations is a very important issue in decision-making theory. This author proposes a new approach to modeling the economic decision-making problem situations with the Analytic hierarchy process and Analytic network process. The main feature of proposed approach is ability to process dependences and feedbacks which may exist between the conditions, sub-conditions and their realizations.

Keywords
modeling of decision-making problem situations, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), analytic network process (ANP), relevant significance estimates of problem situations
Date of publication
01.10.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
862
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Karpov Yu.G. (2006). Imitatsionnoe modelirovanie sistem. Vvedenie v modelirovanie s AnyLogic 5. SPb: BKhV, Peterburg.


Kovriga S.V., Maksimov V.I. (2005). Primenenie strukturno-tselevogo analiza razvitiya sotsial'noehkonomicheskikh situatsij // Problemy upravleniya. № 3.


Kravchenko T.K. (2010). Ehkspertnaya sistema podderzhki prinyatiya reshenij // Otkrytoe obrazovanie. № 6.


Larichev O.I. (2000). Teoriya i metody prinyatiya reshenij, a takzhe Khronika sobytij v Volshebnykh Stranakh. M.: Logos.


Litvak B.G. (1996). Ehkspertnye otsenki i prinyatie reshenij. M.: Patent.


Orlov A.I. (2004). Teoriya prinyatiya reshenij. M.: Mart.


Pavlovskij Yu.N. (2004). Imitatsionnye modeli i sistemy. M.: Fazis, VTs RAN.


Saati T.L. (1993). Prinyatie reshenij – metod analiza ierarkhij. M.: Radio i svyaz'.


Saati T.L. (2008). Prinyatie reshenij pri zavisimostyakh i obratnykh svyazyakh. Analiticheskie seti. M.: LKI.


Trakhtengerts Eh.A. (2001). Sub'ektivnost' v komp'yuternoj podderzhke reshenij. M.: Sinteg.


Fedulov A.S. (2005). Nechetkie relyatsionnye kognitivnye karty // Teoriya i sistemy upravleniya. № 1.


Axelrod R. (1976). The Structure of Decision: Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.


Carvalho J.P., Tome J.A.B. (1999). Rule Based Fuzzy Cognitive Maps – a Comparison with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Proceedings of the NAFIPS99. N.Y., USA.


Kosko B. (1986). Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. International // J. Man-Machine Studies. Vol. 24.


Kravchenko T.K., Seredenko N.N. (2011). Decision-making with modeling of problem situations using the analytic network hierarchy process // International J. of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (IJAHP). N 3 (1).


Saaty R.W. (2002). Decision Making in Complex Environments: The Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Dependence and Feedback. A Manual for the ANP Software SuperDecisions. Pittsburgh: Creative Decisions Foundation.


Saaty T.L. (2003). Decision-Making with the AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary // European J. of Operational Res. Vol. 145 (1).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate