Везде
ASSESSMENT THE IMPACT OF INNOVATIVE CAPACITY QUALITY ON THE INNOVATION ACTIVITY OF THE OECD COUNTRIES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ASSESSMENT THE IMPACT OF INNOVATIVE CAPACITY QUALITY ON THE INNOVATION ACTIVITY OF THE OECD COUNTRIES
Annotation
PII
S042473880000516-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana Balashova 
Edition
Volume 53 Issue 1
Pages
21-35
Abstract

This paper presents an empirical examination of the relationship between the quantitative characteristics of national innovative capacity and the key indicator of innovation activity – patent activity. The theoretical basis of this study is Paul Romer’s model of the new knowledge production and the concept of national innovative capacity by Michael Porter and Scott Stern. Empirical assessment is carried out using econometric tools for panel data. It is shown that the estimates of the model parameters have changed significantly over the past 15 years: the total stock of knowledge held by the country cannot be considered the major driver of innovation activity nowadays. The total level of capital (physical and human) deposited in the knowledge sector of the economy is the key point. The quality characteristics of national innovative capacity such as the level of intellectual property protection, business involvement in the production of new knowledge, the integration of science and education have a significant impact also.

Keywords
innovation potential, intellectual property rights, patenting activity, R&D, fixed effects model, panel data, feasible GLS
Date of publication
01.01.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
954
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Arellano M. (1987). Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-Groups Estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49(4), 431–434.


Balashova S. (2015). The Impact of Public R&D Policy on Business-Funded R&D (Case of OECD Countries). Applied Econometrics 2, 64–82 (in Russian).


Balashova S., Matyushok V. (2012). The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D: Russia and OECD Countries. In: “European Integration Process in Western Balkan Countries”. Coimbra: University of Coimbra, 228–247.


Bassanini A., Scarpetta S. (2001). The Driving Forces of Economic Growth: Panel Data Evidence for the OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies 33. Available at: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00168383/ (accessed: August 2016).


Baumol W.J., Bowen W.G. (1966). Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.


Dementyev V. Ye. (2013). Structural Factors of Technological Development. Economics and Mathematical Methods 49 (4), 33–46 (in Russian).


Furman J., Porter M.E., Stern S. (2002). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy 31, 899–933.


Guellec D., Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. van (2001). R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 3. OECD Publishing.


Izsák K., Markianidou P., Radošević S. (2013). Lessons from a Decade of Innovation Policy: What Can Be Learnt from the INNO Policy TrendChart and The Innovation Union. Final report. EU. Available at: http:// ec.europa.eu/ (accessed: August 2016).


Kirillov V.N. (2012). The Problem of Knowledge Propagation in the Modern Global Economy. Science and Contemporaneity 18, 245–250 (in Russian).


Lvov D.S. (2007). Foreword to the book “Russia in the Globalizing World: Modernization of Russian Economy”. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).


Lvov D.S., Glaziev S. Yu., Fetisov G.G. (1992). The Evolution of the Technical and Economic Systems: the Capabilities and the Restrictions of Centralized Regulation. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).


Matyushok V.M. (2013). Priority Directions of Economic Development in Russia: Formation and Estimation of Innovation Capacity. National Interests: Priorities and Security 7, 4–16 (in Russian).


Mingaleva Zh.A. (2009). On the Usage of International Patent Statistics Databases for Analysis of Innovation Activities Results. Perm University Herald. ECONOMY 2, 65–71 (in Russian).


OECD (2009). OECD Patent Statistics Manual. Paris: OECD Publishing.


OECD (2014). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.


Pavitt K. (1985). Patent Statistics as Indicators of Innovative Activities: Possibilities and Problems. Scientometrics 7(1–2), 77–99.


Porter M.E., Stern S. (1998). National Innovative Capacity. Harvard Business Review 37(9), 1465–1479.


Ratnikova T.A. (2006). Introduction to Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. HSE Economic Journal 2, 267–316 (in Russian).


Revinova S. Yu. (2015). Intensification of Information Technologies Usage for Innovation Development and Economic Growth in Russia. The Bulletin of PFUR, Series Economics 4, 106–121 (in Russian).


Romer P.M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5), 71–102.


Rudtskaja E.R., Khrustalev E. Yu., Tsaganov S.A. (2014). Fundamental Scientific Research and Innovative Development Capabilities. Audit and Financial Analysis 6, 406–412 (in Russian).


Westmore B. (2013). R&D, Patenting and Growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.


Wooldridge J.M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press Books. L.: The MIT Press.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate