Везде
THE DIFFERENTIATION OF THE AUTHORITY IN TAX INCENTIVES AMONG THE FEDERAL AND REGIONAL LEVELS. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE DIFFERENTIATION OF THE AUTHORITY IN TAX INCENTIVES AMONG THE FEDERAL AND REGIONAL LEVELS. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Annotation
PII
S042473880000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Milyausha Pinskaya  Georgy Kolesnik
Edition
Volume 52 Issue 3
Pages
22-35
Abstract
The authors study the problems associated with the differentiation of the authority to establish tax incentives among the federal and regional government bodies and assess the corresponding negative impact on the tax competition. In is shown that the federal intervention in the regional tax privileges setting may lead to a distortion of vertical tax competition, a shortfall in tax revenues in the regional budgets, as well as to the migration of the tax base between regions, thereby distorting the real pocture of the profi ts allocation. The results obtained can be used by federal and regional public authorities in the development of proposals for improving mechanisms of tax privileges provision and interbudgetary transfers optimization.
Keywords
tax powers, tax privileges, tax competition, profit tax, property tax, regional budget, interbudgetary relations, federative system, vertical tax effect, consolidated group of taxpayers
Date of publication
01.07.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
830
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Bykov S.S. (2013). Klassifikatsiya nalogovykh l'got kak uslovie i ehtap otsenki ikh ehffektivnosti // Izvestiya Irkutskoj gosudarstvennoj ehkonomicheskoj akademii. № 5. S. 20-26.             


Voloschuk S.D. (2009). Otsenka ehffektivnosti upravleniya ob'ektami oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa na osnove pokazatelej obschestvennoj stoimosti. M.: Nauka.     


Majburov I.A., Ivanov Yu.B. (2014). Nalogovye l'goty. Teoriya i praktika primeneniya. M.: YuNITI-DANA.              


Nalogovye l'goty: analiz praktiki primeneniya i metodika otsenki ehffektivnosti dejstviya (2011). Rekomendatsii soveschaniya Komiteta Soveta Federatsii po byudzhetu 14 aprelya 2011 goda. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.council.gov.ru/kom_home/kom_budg/documents/item1648.html, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. rus. (data obrascheniya: mart 2014 g.).           


Savina O.N. (2013). Otsenka ehffektivnosti nalogovykh l'got v sovremennoj praktike nalogooblozheniya i napravleniya ee sovershenstvovaniya//Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. № 8(110). S. 579-598.     


Sozdanie konsolidirovannykh grupp nalogoplatel'schikov otritsatel'no povliyalo na postuplenie naloga na pribyl' v byudzhetnuyu sistemu Rossijskoj Federatsii (2014).          


Schetnaya palata RF. Rezul'taty ehkspertno-analiticheskogo meropriyatiya Schetnoj palaty RF. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ach.gov.ru/press_center/news/947?sphrase_id=538855, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. rus. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2015 g.).


Tatarkin D.A., Sidorova E.N. (2010). Nalogovyj federalizm v sisteme stimulirovaniya samorazvitiya regionov//Nalogi i finansovoe pravo. № 4. S. 339-342.         


Auerbach A., Summers L.H. (1979). The Investment Tax Credit: An Evaluation//NBER Working Paper Series. No. 404.     


Fleming J.C., Peroni R.J. (2010). Can Tax Expenditure Analysis Be Divorced from a Normative Tax Base: A Critique of the 'New Paradigm' and its Denouement//Virginia Tax Review. Vol. 30. R. 135-180. 


Keen M., Kotsogiannis C. (2002). Does Federalism Lead to Excessively High Taxes?//American Economic Review. Vol. 92. No. 1. R. 363-370.    


Kothenbiirger M. (2002). Tax Competition and Fiscal Equalization//International Tax and Public Finance. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 391-408.        


Kraan D.-J. (2004). Off-Budget and Tax Expenditures//OECD Journal on Budgeting. Vol. 4. No. 1. R. 121-142.       


McIntyre M.J. (1980). A Solution to the Problem of Defi ning a Tax Expenditure//U.C. Davis Law Review. Vol. 14. No. 1. R. 83-89.             


Shick A. (2007). Off-Budget Expenditure: An Economic and Political Framework//OECD Journal on Budgeting. Vol. 7. No. 3. R. 1-2.     


Surrey S. (1976). The Tax Expenditure Concept and the Budget Reform Act of 1974//Boston College Law Review. Vol. 17. Issue 5. No. 5. R. 679-737.    


Toder E. (2005). Tax Expenditures and Tax Reform: Issues and Analysis. In: "Proceedings of National Tax Association Meetings". November 19. Miami.           


Toder E., Wasow B., Ettlinger P.M. (2002). In Bad Breaks All Around: The Report of the Century Foundation Working Group on Tax Expenditures. N.Y.: The Century Foundation Press.            


Villela L., Lemgruber M., Jorratt M. (2010). Tax Expenditure Budgets. Concepts and Challenges for Implementation. Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper Series. No. IDB-WP-131.       


Wilson J.D. (1986). A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition//Journal of Urban Economics. Vol. 19. No. 3. R. 296-315  


Zodrow G., Mieszkowski P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods//Journal of Urban Economics. Vol. 19. No. 3. R. 356-370.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate