Везде
WORLD OF PROFESSIONS: REVIEW OF ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
WORLD OF PROFESSIONS: REVIEW OF ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Pavel Romanov  Elena Yarskaya-smirnova
Edition
Volume 304 Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 8
Pages
25-35
Abstract
The article reviews the main theoretical approaches to the study of everyday life of professions and professional groups, implicit social interactions, informal relationships, and cultural practices that are usually hidden from the eyes of external observers. The study of these aspects leads to questions about the knowledge that is formed during the work of different group members, separated by status positions, but United by one business and a common world of everyday life. The article contains a brief classification of sociological views on professions, a description of the evolution of socio-anthropological approaches to the study of organizations and work in the XX century. It is shown that normative attributive interpretations of professionalism are common among Russian sociologists, but new trends are noted. Modern Russian studies of the profession are developing in the areas of phenomenology and social criticism, based on field Ethnography and socio-cultural analysis of symbolic forms of everyday life of professional groups and communities.
Keywords
professions, professional groups, everyday life, sociology, social anthropology, Ethnography, phenomenology, social criticism
Date of publication
05.08.2009
Number of purchasers
0
Views
507
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Professiya // Sotsiologiya truda. Teoretiko-prikladnoj slovar' / Pod red. V. A. Yadova. SPb.: Nauka, 2006. S. 245.
 2. Dyurkgejm Eh. O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda. M.: Kanon, 1996; Etzioni A. Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs; New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1964; Parsons T. The Social System. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1951.
 3. Saks M., Olsop Dzh. Sotsiologiya professij: gosudarstvo, meditsina i rynok v Velikobritanii // www.ecsocman.edu.ru/db/msg/30074.html
 4. Durkheim E. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957. P. 29.
 5. Mansurov V. A., Yurchenko O. V. Perspektivy professionalizatsii rossijskikh vrachej v reformiruyuschemsya obschestve // Sotsiol. issled. 2005. N 1. S. 66 - 77.
 6. Reeser L. C, Epstein I. Professionalization and Activism in Social Work: The Sixties, the Eighties, and the Future. New York: Columbia University Press. 1996. P. 70 - 71.
 7. Greenwood E. Attributes of a Profession // M. Zald (ed.) Social Welfare Institutions. London: Wiley, 1965. P. 509 - 523.
 8. Millerson G. L. The Qualifying Association. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.
 9. Freidson E. Professional Dominance. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1970; Larson M. S. The Rise of Professionalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1977; Mills C. W. White Collar. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953. 
 10. Jones S., Joss R. Models of Professionalism // M. Yelloly, M. Henkel (eds) Learning and Teaching in Social Work. London; Bristol; Pennsylvania: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1995. P. 18.
 11. Kh'yuz Eh. Ch. Oshibki na rabote // Zhurnal issledovanij sotsial'noj politiki. 2008. Tom 6. N 3. S. 385 - 396.
 12. Boltanski L., Thevenot L. Finding one's way in social space: a study based on games // Social science information. 1983. Vol. 22. N 4 - 5. P. 631 - 680.
 13. Popova I. P. Professional'nyj status spetsialistov v menyayuschemsya rossijskom obschestve. M.: Nauka, 2004. S. 22.
 14. Abercrombie N. et al. Dictionary of Sociology. London: Penguin Books, 1984. Russkoe izdanie: Aberkrombi N. i dr. Sotsiologicheskij slovar'. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan, un-ta, 1997; Jary D., Jary J. The Harper Collins Dictionary of Sociology. Harper Perennial. 1991. Russkoe izdanie: Dzheri D., Dzheri Dzh. Bol'shoj tolkovyj sotsiologicheskij slovar' (Kollinz). V 2 t. / Per. s angl. M: Veche, ACT, 1999.
 15. Rossijskaya sotsiologicheskaya ehntsiklopediya / Pod obsch. red. G. V. Osipova. M: NormaInfra-M, 1998.
 16. Zdravomyslov A., Rozhin V., Yadov V. Chelovek i ego rabota. M.: Mysl', 1967.
 17. Girtts K. V poiskakh interpretativnoj teorii kul'tury // Antologiya issledovanij kul'tury. T. 1. SPb., 1997.
 18. Ol'shanskij V. B. Byli my rannimi // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 1995. N 1.S. 195 - 205.
 19. Alekseev A. I. Dramaticheskaya sotsiologiya (ehksperiment sotsiologa-rabochego). Kn. 1 i 2. M.: In-t sotsiologii RAN, 1997.
 20. Sotsiologiya: Ehntsiklopediya / Sost. A. A. Gritsanov, V L. Abushenko, G. M. Evel'kin, G. N. Sokolova, O. V. Tereschenko. Minsk: Knizhnyj Dom, 2003.
 21. Batygin G. S. Professionaly v raskoldovannom mire // Ehtika uspekha: vestnik issledovatelej, konsul'tantov i LPR. Vyp. 3. Tyumen'; Moskva, 1994. S. 9 - 19.
 22. Golenkova Z. T., Igitkhanyan E. D. Professionaly - portret na fone reform // Sotsiol. issled. 2005. N 2. S. 28 - 36.
 23. Aleksandrova T. L. Metodologicheskie problemy sotsiologii professij // Sotsiol. issled. 2000. N 8. S. 12.
 24. Smirnova I. Chem slozhnee rabota, tem vyshe razryad: Interv'yu s N. A. Sofijskim // Kadrovoe delo. 2003. N 10. // http://www.kdelo.ru/kd.pi?page=state&id=1269 
 25. Kokoreva A. V. V Rossii poyavilis' novye professii i dolzhnosti // Kadry predpriyatiya. 2003. N 8 // http://www.dis.ru/kp/arhiv/2003/8/1.html
 26. Gurevich L. O. V mire perevodcheskikh professij // Mir perevoda. 1994. N 4 // http://www.ets.ru/arc09-r.htm
 27. HISCO - Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations: Web-Based Information System on the History of Work. Last updated: October 11, 2001 // http://www.iisg.nl/research/hisco.html
 28. Wright S. Culture in Anthropology and Organizational Studies // S. Wright (ed.). Anthropology of Organizations. L.; N. Y.: Routledge, 1994. P. 1 - 34.
 29. Romanov P. V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E. R. Antropologicheskie issledovaniya professij // Antropologiya professij. Saratov: Nauchnaya kniga, TsSPGI, 2005. S. 13 - 49; Romanov P. V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E. R. Mir professij kak pole antropologicheskikh issledovanij // Ehtnograficheskoe obozrenie. N 5. 2008. S. 3 - 17.
 30. Burawoy M. The Anthropology of Industrial Work // Annual Review of Anthropology. 1979. N 8. P. 231 - 66.
 31. Jorgensen D. L. Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Newbury Park; London; New Delhy: Sage, 1989. P. 23 - 24.
 32. Schepanskaya T. E. Antropologiya professij // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2003. T. VI. N 1. S. 141.
 33. Owen M. J. Studying Organizational Symbolism: Qualitative Research Methods Series. L.: Sage, 1996. P. 13.
 34. Il'ina M. Chastnyj izvoz v provintsial'nom gorode: samoorganizatsiya sotsial'noj gruppy // Rubezh. 1999. N 13 - 14. S. 201 - 218; Alasheev S. Neformal'nye otnosheniya v protsesse proizvodstva: vzglyad iznutri // Sotsiol. issled. 1995. N 2. S. 12 - 19; Kiblitskaya M. Russkij chastnyj biznes: vzglyad iznutri//Rubezh. 1997. N 10 - 11. S. 210 - 222.
 35. Antropologiya professij / Pod red. P. V. Romanova, E. R. Yarskoj-Smirnovoj. Saratov: Nauchnaya kniga, TsSPGI, 2005; Bannikov KL. Antropologiya ehkstremal'nykh grupp: Dominantnye otnosheniya voennosluzhaschikh srochnoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Armii. M: In-t ehtnologii i antropologii RAN, 2002; Romanov P. V. Strategiya kejs-stadi v issledovanii sotsial'nykh sluzhb // Sotsiol. issled. 2005. N 4. S. 101 - 110; Shumov K. Eh. Professional'nyj
 mif programmistov // Sovremennyj gorodskoj fol'klor. M.: RGGU, 2003. S. 128 - 164; Professii.doc / Pod red. P. V. Romanova, E. R. Yarskoj-Smirnovoj M.: Variant, TsSPGI, 2007.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate