Impact of constitutional changes on legal regulation of relationships between president and parliament in Kyrgyzstan
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Impact of constitutional changes on legal regulation of relationships between president and parliament in Kyrgyzstan
Annotation
PII
S013207690001945-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
G. Iskakova 
Affiliation: American University of Central Asia
Address: Kyrgyzstan
Edition
Pages
96-106
Abstract

In the paper presented the author analyzes constitutional changes, including the last Constitution adopted by decision of referendum on 27 of June 2010, which were basically devoted to the division of power between the two nationwide elected bodies – parliament and president in Kyrgyzstan. Though many Soviet and contemporary representatives of legal scholarship have made contributions in studies of supreme state power organization, experience of Kyrgyzstan, small country, in which the Constitution was modified so many times, represents an interest as insufficiencies of constitutional design, also existing in other countries with similar arrangements, are exacerbated by social problems that cannot be compensated by rich natural resources. The article considers alterations in the legal regulation of interrelated authorities of president and parliament in the course of political developments in Kyrgyzstan and suggests, when possible, arrangements that would help reaching more optimal balance in supreme power organization within the existing form of government and promote the development of the country in democratic and rule of law oriented frameworks. 

Keywords
Constitution of Kyrgyzstan, President, Parliament
Received
26.10.2018
Date of publication
29.10.2018
Number of purchasers
12
Views
2123
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Akaev A. Pamyatnoe desyatiletie. Bishkek, 2001. S. 164.

2. Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran: ucheb. / ruk. avt. koll. i otv. red. B.A. Strashun: v 4-kh t. T. 1-2. M., 1996. S. 494.

3. Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators / eds. P. Harris and B. Reilly: Handbook Series. Stockholm, 1998. P. 219.

4. Inostrannoe konstitutsionnoe pravo / pod red. V.V. Maklakova. M., 1996. S. 58, 176

5. Novye konstitutsii stran SNG i Baltii: sb. dok. / otv. red. N.A. Mikhaleva. Vyp. 2. M., 1998. S. 55–104.

6. Pigolkin A.S. O sootnoshenii zakonov i ukazov Prezidenta v Rossijskoj Federatsii // Vestnik Mezhparlamentskoj Assamblei. 1995. № 1. S. 37, 38

7. Pigolkin A.S. O sootnoshenii zakonov i ukazov prezidenta v Rossijskoj Federatsii. S. 39.

8. Scott R.E. National Integration Problems and Military Regimes in Latin America. // Latin American Modernization Problems / ed. R.E. Scott. Chicago, 1973; Shugart M.S. and Carey J.M. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge, 1992. R. 140, 141.

9. Keri Dzh. Rekomendatsii po reforme Konstitutsii Kyrgyzstana. // Konstitutsionnoe stroitel'stvo prezidentsko-parlamentskikh otnoshenij na postsovetskom prostranstve: sb. materialov seminara / sost. G.T. Iskakova, U.A. Dzhakishev, M.D. Razbaeva. Bishkek, 2003. S. 18

10. Shugart M.S., Carey J.M. Presidents and Assemblies. R. 140.

11. Akaev A.: Kyrgyzstan – nash obschij dom // Vechernij Bishkek. 1998. 1 okt.

12. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / otv. red. V.M. Korel'skij i V.D. Perevalov. Ekaterinburg, 1996. S. 180

13. Avtonomov A.S. Pravovaya ontologiya politiki. K postroeniyu sistemy kategorij. M., 1999. S. 200

14. Chirkin V.E. Netipichnye formy pravleniya v sovremennom gosudarstve // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994. № 1. S. 113.

15. Chirkin V.E. Gosudarstvovedenie. ucheb. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M., 2000. S. 150.

16. Shugart M.S., Carey J.M. Presidents and Assemblies. R. 160, 161.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate