Везде
ТЕМПОРАЛЬНЫЕ ДЕЙКТИЧЕСКИЕ ЖЕСТЫ
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ТЕМПОРАЛЬНЫЕ ДЕЙКТИЧЕСКИЕ ЖЕСТЫ
Annotation
PII
S241377150000616-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena А. Grishina 
Edition
Volume 72 Issue 1
Pages
3-31
Abstract
By pointing at something one can indicate not only the position of the designated objects in space, but also the localization of events in time. The paper investigates this representational problem basing on the data of the Multimodal Russian Corpus (MURCO), constituent of the Russian National Corpus. The author has analyzed the main factors, which determine the choice of spatial directions, common for Russian temporal gesticulation, and has come to conclusion that in the Russian system of spatial reference the sagittal axis (forward vs. backward) is intended for the temporal meaning proper, while the transverse axis (right vs. left) is used preferably as the evidential axis (opinion vs. fact).
Keywords
temporal gesticulation, pointing, Russian-language spatial system, multimodal corpora
Date of publication
01.01.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1185
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. De Jorio A. La mimica degli antichi investigate nel gestire napoletano. Fibreno. Naples, 1832 (angl. perevod: De Jorio A. Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. Indiana Univ. Press. Bloomington, IA, 2000).
2. Calbris G. Espace-Temps: Expression gestuelle du temps // Semiotica. 1985, № 55-1/2. P. 43-73.
3. Calbris G. The semiotics of French gesture. Indiana Univ. Press. Bloomington, IA, 1990.
4. Haviland J.B. Anchoring, iconicity and orientation in Guugu Ymithirr pointing gestures // Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 1993, № 3. P. 3-45.
5. Nunez R., Sweetser E. Looking ahead to the past: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time // Cognitive Science. 2006, № 30. P. 1-49.
6. Clark H.H. Space, time, semantics and the child // Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. Moore T.E. (ed.). Academic Press. New York, 1973. P. 27-63.
7. Casasanto D., Bottini R. Can Mirror-Reading Reverse the Flow of Time? // Spatial Cognition VII. Lecture Notes in Artifi cial Intelligence. C. Holscher et al. (Eds.). Vol. 6222. Springer-Verlag. Berlin-Heidelberg, 2010. P. 335-345.
8. Boroditsky L., Fuhrman O., McCormick K. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? // Cognition. Vol. 118, Issue 1, January 2011. P. 123-129.
9. Chen Jenn-Yeu. Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001) // Cognition. Vol. 104, 2007. P. 427-436.
10. Cooperrider K., Nunez R. Doing time: Speech, gesture, and conceptualization of time // Center for Research in Language (CRL) Technical Report, V. 19, № 3. December 2007.
11. Calbris G. From left to right Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space // Metaphor and gesture. A. Cienki and C. Muller (Eds). Benjamins. Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 2008. P. 27-53.
12. Kranjec A., McDonough L. The implicit and explicit embodiment of time // Journal of Pragmatics, № 43, 2011. P. 735-748.
13. Casasanto D., Jasmin K. The Hands of Time: Temporal gestures in English speakers // Cognitive Linguistics, 2012. In press. [Uncorrected Draft].
14. Fuhrman O., Boroditsky L. Mental time-lines follow writing direction: Comparing English and Hebrew speakers // Proceedings of 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Nashville, TN, 2007. P. 1007.
15. Ouellet M., Santiago J., Israeli Z., Gabay Sh. Is the Future the Right Time? // Experimental Psychology. Vol. 57(4), 2010. P. 308-314.
16. Suitner C. Where to place social targets? Stereotyping and Spatial Agency Bias. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Psychology, University of Padova, 2009.
17. Kyle J.G., Woll B. Sign Language. The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambr., 1985.
18. Zucchi, S. Tense, Time, and Adverbs in Italian Sign Language // Universit\'a degli Studi di Milano, August 13, 2005. http://fi losofi a.dipafi lo.unimi.it/~zucchi/NuoviFile/ LIStense&adverbs.pdf
19. Grishina E.A. Russkaya sistema golovnyh ukazatel'nyh zhestov // Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2013 (v pechati).
20. Cienki A. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions // Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. Koenig J.-P. (Ed.). Center for the Study of Language and Information. Stanford, CA, 1998. P. 189-204.
21. Elms J.T.E. Gesture-to-Speech Mismatch in the Construction of Problem Solving Insight // 36th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2010. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/215649849_ Gesture-to-Speech_Mismatch_in_the_Construction_ of_Problem_Solving_Insight 
22. Kendon A. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambr., 2004.
23. Grishina E.A. Avtodejksis: osnovnye tipy i znacheniya // Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii. Po materialam ezhegodnoj Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii Dialog (2012). Vyp. 11. M., 2012. S. 173-186 (polnyj variant stat'i http://ruslang.academia.edu/ElenaGrishina/ Papers). 
24. Grishina E.A. Ukazaniya rukoj kak sistema (po dannym Mul'timedijnogo russkogo korpusa) // VYa. 2012. № 3. S. 3-50. 
25. Calbris G. La tete de Nicolas Sarkozy, ou les fonctions des gestes de la tete durant l\'enonciation // Mots. Le langages du politique. 2011. № 9. P. 98-118.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate