Везде

RAS Social ScienceЭкономика и математические методы Economics and the Mathematical Methods

  • ISSN (Print) 0424-7388
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6177

Assessment of the carbon footprint of Russian economic sectors and industrial decarbonization measures

You can
PII
S30346177S0424738825030078-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034617725030078
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E.Yu. Yakovleva
  • Occupation: Cand. Sc. (Economics), Senior Researcher
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Economic Faculty
A.V. Baraboshkina
  • Occupation: Cand. Sc. (Economics), Researcher
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Economic Faculty
O.V. Kudryavtseva
  • Occupation: Doc. Sc. (Economics), Professor
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Economic Faculty
A.A. Kurdin
  • Occupation: Cand. Sc. (Economics), Senior Researcher
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Economic Faculty
Volume/ Edition
Volume 61 / Issue number 3
Pages
78-91
Abstract
Climate change poses significant threats to the Russian economy. In this context, it is essential to develop a comprehensive set of measures for mitigating and adapting to climate challenges. The European Union’s Carbon Border Mechanism (CBAM) which is set to take effect in 2026, as well as the potential implementation of similar mechanisms by other countries, pose challenges for carbon-intensive industries. The development of a national system for assessing the carbon footprint, including both direct and indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and mechanisms for minimizing these emissions at both sectoral and corporate levels is of critical importance for Russia. This study evaluates the total gross GHG emissions and total GHG emissions per unit of production in eight sectors of the Russian economy using an input–output balance model. Furthermore, it analyzes decarbonization tools employed by major Russian industrial companies, which are leading producers and exporters of carbon-intensive products. Recommendations are provided to improve the mechanisms for low-carbon development of the Russian industries. It is revealed that the energy and mining sectors, as well as manufacturing industries (particularly metallurgy, chemical industry and mineral materials manufacturing) are characterized by high total gross GHG emissions and high total emissions per unit of production. A practical conclusion is the importance of aligning carbon regulation with "smart" "green" industrial policy measures. Such policies should account for cross-sectoral effects and strategically influence production and supply chains to maximize efficiency in reducing emissions with minimal costs. Additionally, these measures should contribute to achieving broader positive socio-economic outcomes.
Keywords
модель межотраслевого баланса таблицы "затраты-выпуск" углеродный след углеродоемкость трансграничное углеродное регулирование декарбонизация промышленности
Date of publication
18.12.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
32

References

  1. 1. Бобылев С. Н., Соловьева С. В., Киришин П. А. (2022). Крах глобальной модели потребления: в поисках устойчивости // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 66. № 11. С. 92–100. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-11-92-100
  2. 2. Bobylev S. N., Solovyeva S. V., Kiryushin P. A. (2022). The collapse of the global consumption model: In search of sustainability. World Economy and International Relations, 66, 11, 92–100. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-11-92-100 (in Russian).
  3. 3. Вотинов А. И., Лазарян С. С., Радионов С. А., Судаков С. С. (2021). Оценка последствий применения механизма трансграничного углеродного регулирования Евросоюза для России // Экономический журнал ВШЭ. Т. 25. № 3. С. 452–477. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-3-452-477
  4. 4. Votinov A. I., Lazaryan S. S., Radionov S. A., Sudakov S. S. (2021). Impact of EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on Russia. HSE Economic Journal, 25, 3, 452–477. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-3-452-477 (in Russian).
  5. 5. Единак Е. А. (2022). Межопределенный баланс в системе экономического анализа. М.: ИНП РАН. Режим доступа: https://ecfor.ru/publication/mezhotraslevoj-balans-i-sistema-natsionalnyh-schetov/
  6. 6. Edinak E. A. (2022). Inputoutput balance in the system of economic analysis. Available at: https://ecfor.ru/publication/mezhotraslevoj-balansi-sistema-natsionalnyh-schetov/ (in Russian).
  7. 7. Едовина Т. (2023). Углеродный налог и ныне тут // Коммерсант. Режим доступа: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/60979017ysclid-m3c3bp8fgg632033193
  8. 8. Edovina T. (2023). Carbon tax is still here. Kommersant. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6097901?ysclid=m3c3bp8fgg632033193 (in Russian).
  9. 9. ИПЕМ (2021). СВАМ: теперь официально. Возможные эффекты для России. Режим доступа: https://cenef-xxi.ru/uploads/Session_2_A_Grigoriev_a822740b7d.pdf
  10. 10. Institute of problems of natural monopolies (IPEM) (2021). CBAM: now it is official. Possible effects for Russia. Available at: https://cenef-xxi.ru/uploads/Session_2_A_Grigoriev_a822740b7d.pdf (in Russian).
  11. 11. Коссов В. В. (1966). Межопределенный баланс. М.: Экономика.
  12. 12. Kossov V. V. (1966). Input-output balance. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).
  13. 13. Кудрявцева О. В., Тетерина Н. В., Яковлева Е. Ю., Ситкина К. С. (2015). Экономический анализ движения природных ресурсов в России: коллективная монография. М.: Проспект. 144 с.
  14. 14. Kudryavtseva O. V., Teterina N. V., Yakovleva E.Yu., Sitkina K. S. (2015). Economic analysis of flows of natural resources in Russia: collective monograph. Moscow: Prospekt. 144 p. (in Russian).
  15. 15. Макаров И. А., Алаташ С. (2024). Выбросы парниковых газов по потреблению: от расчетов к политическим решениям // Вестник международных организаций. Т. 19. № 1. С. 85–105. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2024-01-04
  16. 16. Makarov I. A., Alataş S. (2024). Toward consumption-based GHG emissions accounting: From calculation to policy-making. International Organisations Research Journal, 19, 1, 85–105. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2024-01-04 (in Russian).
  17. 17. Макаров И. А., Соколова А. К. (2014). Оценка углеродоемкости внешней торговли России // Экономический журнал ВШЭ. Т. 18. № 3. С. 477–507. Режим доступа: https://ej.hse.ru/2014-18-3/137770485.html
  18. 18. Makarov I. A., Sokolova A. K. (2014). Carbon emissions embodied in Russia’s trade. HSE Economic Journal, 18, 3, 477–507. Available at: https://ej.hse.ru/en/2014-18-3/137770485.html (in Russian).
  19. 19. Макаров И. А., Чернокульский А. В. (2023). Влияние изменения климата на экономику России: рейтинг регионов по необходимости адаптации // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 4 (61). С. 145–202. DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2023_4_145-202
  20. 20. Makarov I. A., Chernokulsky A. V. (2023). Impacts of climate change on the Russian economy: Ranking of regions by adaptation needs. Journal of the New Economic Association, 4 (61), 145–202. DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2023_4_145-202 (in Russian).
  21. 21. Масакова И. Д. (2019). Российская практика составления таблиц «затраты–выпуск»: проблемы и перспективы развития // Проблемы прогнозирования. № 2. С. 14–26. Режим доступа: https://ecfor.ru/publication/rossijskaya-praktika-sostavleniya-tabilis-zatraty-vypusky
  22. 22. Masakova I. D. (2019). The Russian practice of compiling input-output tables: Problems and prospects of development. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2, 14–26. Available at: https://ecfor.ru/publication/mezhotraslevoj-balans-i-sistema-natsionalnyh-schetov/ (in Russian).
  23. 23. Петров А. А., Поспелов И. Г., Шапанин А. А. (1996). Опыт математического моделирования экономики. М.: Энергоатомизация.
  24. 24. Petrov A. A., Pospelov I. G., Shananin A. A. (1996). Experience of mathematical modeling of economy. Moscow: Energoatomizdat (in Russian).
  25. 25. Порфирьев Б. Н., Данилов-Данильян В. И. (ред.) (2022). Изменения климата и экономика России: тенденции, сценарии, прогнозы. М.: Научный консультант. 514 с. ISBN: 978-5-907477-31-5
  26. 26. Porfiriev B. N., Danilov-Danilian V.I. (eds.) (2022). Climate Change and the Russian economy: Trends, scenarios, forecasts. Moscow: Nauchnyj konsul’tant. 514 p. ISBN: 978-5-907477-31-5 (in Russian).
  27. 27. Порфирьев Б. Н., Широв А. А., Колпаков А. Ю., Единак Е. А. (2022). Возможности и риски политики климатического регулирования в России // Вопросы экономики. № 1. С. 72–89. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-1-72-89
  28. 28. Porfiriev B. N., Shirov A. A., Kolpakov A. Y., Edinak E. A. (2022). Opportunities and risks of the climate policy in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1, 72–89. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-1-72-89 (in Russian).
  29. 29. Яковлева Е.Ю. (2016). Экономическая оценка межопределенных потоков природных ресурсов и загрязнений. Дис... канд. экон. наук: 08.00.05. М.: МТУ им. М.В. Ломоносова.
  30. 30. Yakovleva E. Yu. (2016). Economic assessment of intersectoral flows of natural resources and pollution: dis… cand. econ. sciences: 08.00.05. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University (in Russian).
  31. 31. Яшалова Н.Н., Васильнов В.С., Потравный И.М. (2020). Декарбонизация черной металлургии: цели и инструменты регулирования // Черные металлы. № 8. С. 70–75.
  32. 32. Yashalova N. N., Vasiltsov V. S., Potravny I. M. (2020). Decarbonization of ferrous metallurgy: Objectives and regulatory instruments. Chernye Metally, 8, 70–75 (in Russian).
  33. 33. Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Bursztyn L., Hennous D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102 (1), 131–166.
  34. 34. Aghion P., Hepburn C., Teytelboym A., Zenghelis D. (2019). Path dependence, innovation and the economics of climate change. In: R. Fouquet (ed.) Handbook on green growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 67–83.
  35. 35. Benson E., Majkut J., Reinsch W.A., Steinberg F. (2023). Analyzing the European Union’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. CSIS. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/analyzing-european-unions-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism
  36. 36. Chandrakumar C., McLaren S.J., Malik A., Ramlian T., Lenzen M. (2020). Understanding New Zealand’s consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions: An application of multi-regional input-output analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25, 1323–1332. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-019-01673-z
  37. 37. European Commission (2023). The Carbon border adjustment mechanism: A new, green way of pricing carbon in imports to the EU. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/2023/CBAM%20general%20presentation_2023-11-16_EN.pdf
  38. 38. Jiang T., Yu Y., Jahanger A., Balsalobre-Lorente D. (2022). Structural emissions reduction of China’s power and heating industry under the goal of “double carbon”: A perspective from input-output analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 346–356. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.003
  39. 39. Juhász R., Lane N. (2024). The political economy of industrial policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38 (4), 27–54. DOI: 10.1257/jep.38.4.27
  40. 40. Kudryavtseva O.V., Sitkina K.S., Baraboshkina A.V. (2023). Indicators of the transition of Russia to low-carbon development. Geography and Natural Resources, 44, 260–270. DOI: 10.1134/S187537282303006X
  41. 41. Kudryavtseva O.V., Yakovleva E.Y. (2016). Accounting of water flows used in Russian economy and estimation of the water accumulated in exported products. Water Resources, 43 (4), 718–729. DOI: 10.1134/S0097807816040102
  42. 42. McWilliams B., Zachmann G. (2023). Smart green industrial policy. In: S. Tagliapetra, R. Veugelers (eds.) “Sparking Europe’s new industrial revolution: A policy for net zero, growth and resilience”. Brussels: Bruegel Blueprint, 186–209.
  43. 43. Ranganathan J., Corbier L., Bhatia P., Schmitz S., Gage P., Oren K. (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol: A corporate accounting and reporting standard, revised edition. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Available at: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf
  44. 44. Rodrik D. (2014). Green industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30 (3), 469–491.
  45. 45. Stiglitz J.E., Stern N., Duan M., Edenhofer O. (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Washington: The World Bank.
  46. 46. Terzi A. (2023). Green industrial policy: The necessary evil to avoid a climate catastrophe. In: S. Tagliapetra, R. Veugelers (eds.) “Sparking Europe’s new industrial revolution: A policy for net zero, growth and resilience”. Brussels: Bruegel Blueprint, 106–121.
  47. 47. United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available at: https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/70/1
  48. 48. Únal E., Lin B., Managi S. (2023). CO emissions embodied in bilateral trade in China: An input-output analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 103, 107218. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107218
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library